A.R.I.A. — Affective Reasoning & Intelligent Adaptation

Most Wearables
Measure Stress.
None of Them Know You.

538 million devices ship the same one-size-fits-all model. We built the personalization layer that makes it accurate — for each individual. A.R.I.A. is the missing API between raw wearable data and real human-state intelligence.

89.8%

Lab balanced accuracy after per-user calibration (WESAD, N=15, binary)

+10.4pp

Lift over the 79.4% zero-shot baseline (lab)

~56%

Field balanced accuracy at 30 self-report labels (DAPPER, N=20 at that budget, N=84 cohort)

437

Automated tests, ML leakage audited

Galaxy Watch

Validated on Galaxy Watch 5 data (GalaxyPPG, N=23, 71.8%). Live raw-PPG support today: Galaxy Watch 8.

Lab-validated under controlled conditions. Paper submitted to ACM IMWUT, May 2026. Full methodology and data

The Discovery:
Labels, Not Models.

Every competitor is building better algorithms. Our data shows that's the wrong problem. In field conditions, the architectures we tested converge. The bottleneck is calibration — how you collect and label the data.

Finding 1

Architecture Converges

In field conditions, the three architectures we tested converge between 0.534 and 0.565 at 30 labeled moments (DAPPER, N=20 at that budget). No pairwise comparison reaches significance after correction, and no large effect size appears across 21 tests. Medium effects cannot be ruled out at this sample size.

Finding 2

Calibration Changes Everything

A short structured calibration session covering both activated and resting states lifts balanced accuracy from 79.4% to 89.8% in controlled conditions. That's the gap between a generic stress score and one that actually knows you. Personalization is the product.

Finding 3

First to Measure It

No prior paper compares calibration cost across model families under identical protocols. Our 25-page paper (submitted to ACM IMWUT, May 2026) is the first systematic measurement. This reframes the field.

Population-level models (Apple, Garmin)

“Stress: 87%”

Black-box algorithm

Same model for everyone

No personalized calibration

No per-user explainability

A.R.I.A. — Calibrated to you

“Elevated arousal — calibrated to your baseline. Consistent pattern during evaluative contexts.”

Explainable — shows why, not just what

Personalized to each individual

Private by architecture — models small enough to run on-device

Transparent and auditable

Three Layers,
Each Independently Valuable.

A.R.I.A. is not a single product. It is a progressively richer system where each layer's data builds the next.

Layer 1 — Now

Wrist: Arousal Detection

Stressed or not stressed — detected from your existing wearable, calibrated to your own baseline in a short structured session covering both activated and resting states. Already works in controlled conditions.

Every competitor ships a generic model. This is the first personalized one.

Layer 2 — Next

Wrist + Voice: Emotion

Add voice analysis (opt-in) to distinguish happy from stressed, sad from calm. Custom labels that learn your emotional vocabulary over time.

No competitor combines wrist calibration with voice.

Layer 3 — Destination

Your Emotional Map

Over time, the system builds a map of your emotional life that is unique to you — discovered from your own data, not predefined categories.

Nothing like this exists from wearables today.

The Destination

Beyond Emotion — The Platform

A.R.I.A.'s calibration methodology is state-agnostic. The same pipeline that personalizes arousal detection extends to focus, fatigue, cognitive load, and any state a user can label. We start with affect because it's the strongest wrist signal. The platform grows into a unified human-state API — where arousal, emotion, attention, and energy are different views of the same per-user model.

Focus & Attention

Via future EEG integration

Fatigue & Energy

Via longitudinal wrist patterns

Cognitive Load

Via multimodal sensor fusion

Custom States

“Deep work,” “pre-meeting dread,” “recovery” — user-defined, system-learned

Same calibration methodology. Same privacy architecture. Same API. Every new state makes the per-user model richer.

538M

wearables shipped in 2024 — sensor infrastructure already in pockets

$17B+

TAM by 2030 — digital therapeutics and health APIs ($8B, Grand View 2024), XR biometric tooling ($6B, ARinsider/IDC 2026), enterprise productivity and wellness ($3B, McKinsey 2024)

$3B

SAM by 2027 — the serviceable slice of those segments where a per-user calibration API fits today

Built by Scientists
and Engineers.

437 tests. 25-page paper submitted May 2026. Real-time streaming API. Galaxy Watch validated. This team ships.

Research Advisor

Sonia
Litwin

Sonia Litwin

10+ years EEG/HRV research.

CTO & Co-founder

Marco
Accardi

Marco Accardi

Built the research pipeline and calibration architecture. Sole inventor on the USPTO provisional.

CEO & Co-founder

Alessandro
De Angelis

Alessandro De Angelis

Leads strategy, partnerships and US go-to-market.

CMO

Sabrina
Pippa

Sabrina Pippa

Brand and visual communication.

Partners

Oracle for Startups · NVIDIA Inception

Meet the full team

For Researchers

Run A.R.I.A.'s calibration analysis on your own wearable dataset — at no cost. Get per-subject accuracy with and without personalization, calibration gain analysis, and architecture comparison.

Learn More

For Device Makers

Building a wearable with stress detection? Our submitted paper measures what per-user calibration costs on Samsung Galaxy Watch data — the first systematic measurement across model families under identical protocols.

Get in Touch